Tattoos are part of a counter-culture. According to my father, it used to be the only people who had them were old-school sailors, art freaks, and those who had spent time in prison. Granted, not necessarily accurate, but an average human being growing up in the mid 20th century was immersed in this type of thinking. When it comes to tattoos on employees, my father is very adamant, “no way. Never.”
It is a very different time than when my father grew up. Over half a century later it is reported by Pew Research that 14% of Americans are tattooed. With so many people with ink on their bodies, is it still fair to determine a person’s employment status based on tattoos? Writer Rachel Hennessey of Forbes, a leading institution in business and financial information, found that most companies agree that a person’s physical appearance is not nearly as important as their job performance.
Yet even as the number of people getting tattoos continues to increase and companies being for job performance over physical appearance, the New York Times reports that 61% of human-resource managers said a tattoo would hurt a job applicant’s chances. This was found in an annual survey by York College of Pennsylvania’s Çenter for Professional Excellence. Even more interesting, the 61% is up from 57% in 2011.
Now, it is understandable that an extremely visible tattoo or one offensive in nature would be a problem. A skull tattoo across a woman’s chest could be just as distracting as someone who wears a banana suit to work every day in a law firm. What is being worn might not be important, but it certainly sets a tone of professionalism. Steve Winter, president of Brotman Winter Fried, a communications & public relations company in McLean, Virginia, agrees, “somebody with tattoos that are what I could consider tasteful, if qualified, I would hire in a heartbeat. That would not prohibit me from hiring somebody.” When asked if he takes tattoos into consideration when he is hiring someone, Winter states,
“It's really more a matter of presentation to our client. While tattoos are certainly prevalent throughout society, you just don't know how some clients or some organizations will relate to or respond to people who have visible tattoos, so I see having staffers with tattoos as having to be more in line with society's general acceptance. Personally, I have no issue with one or two tasteful tats in appropriate places and most people do not, but I will admit that I would almost certain not hire somebody whose arms, lets say, are completely covered with tattoos for an account services job only because you don't know how the client will respond.”
On another side of the coin, you have the non-corporate portion of the population. The question arises: Do the same rules apply? The standard answer appears to be that it depends on the industry. Managing Director and Partner of PR at Partners Salon & Spas, Dede Castronovo speaks on her business in the cosmetic industry. When asked if PR at Partners had a tattoo policy, her response answered many questions. “Not in this industry,” Castronovo says,
“Because we are based in an industry that is dedicated to the art of individual expression, we can not prohibit tattoos, nor would we want to. The designers (hair stylists) use their tattoos as well as their hair as a form of expression. It would not make sense to completely restrict them. We do have issues with some facial piercings, but that is a whole other topic!”
Expression is important in some industries and tattoos are used as just that, expression. The hairstyling industry is about art and tattoos also qualify as art. Castronovo was quick to say that while she is accepting of them, she has had to ask some stylists to cover certain tattoos, “sometimes they are just too much. I never say that all of them should be covered but there was one that freaked me out a little bit. I had to ask the stylist to keep it under wraps while I was around!”
Parents in my neighborhood have even reported that they would feel more comfortable with a babysitter/nanny with zero tattoos as opposed to one that is tattooed. Does the tattoo affect job performance? No but it does have the potential to influence the children being looked after. Interestingly enough, my younger sister has been a nanny for six years and many families. She is the most sought after person to look over kids. She has two tattoos. What keeps parents coming back to her is her ability to watch children. The fact she has ink on her body does not seem to influence their view of her. They have seen her performance and they know she is one of the best.
My older sister also has a couple tattoos. She is fresh out of college and works in the accounting department of one of the largest companies in the world. She can cover hers up. No one knows she has tattoos and she does not plan on ever letting them know. That must be the secret. If no one knows you have tattoos, you cannot get in trouble for having them. Furthermore, if they are not visible, there is no issue of distraction.
Working as an intern for a successful public relations company, I have seen no tattoos on my fellow employees at the office, but I know they have them. Conversations come up while everyone sits at their desks and it is an open discussion. At the holiday party people do not work to cover their ink. Even the upper management knows. They are not hired or fired but as long as they follow the dress code, like my older sister, no one is the wiser.
Here is what one should take from this: not hiring employees based on tattoos is wrong. One can miss out on amazing personnel opportunities because the HR person does not like the word “believe” inked on a person’s wrist. On the other hand, those looking to get a job need to respect the company’s policy toward tattoos, i.e. the dress code. Just because you are proud of the intoxicated unicorn on your forearm does not mean the client spending thousands of dollars for your tax help will. It depends on the industry and the company. Respect their policy and they will respect you for it.